Wikipedia:Requests for page protection |
| | | ca | | | de | | | en | | | es | | | fr | | | it | | | nl | | | no | | | pl | | | pt | | | ru | | | ro | | | fi | | | sv | | | tr | | | vo | | |
| |  |
|
| Requests for page protection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This page is for requesting that a page, image or template be fully protected, semi-protected, move-protected or unprotected. Please read up on the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection is usually used only to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. After a page has been protected, the protection is listed in the page history and logs with a short description indicating why it was protected, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. Further discussion should take place on the Talk page of the article. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins do not revert back to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
If you would like to request a page to be protected or unprotected, please follow the following steps:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Example
===={{la|Intentionally permanent red link}}====
'''semi-protect'''. High level of IP vandalism. ~~~~
Current requests for protection
Place requests for either semi-protection, full protection, move protection, or create protection at the TOP of this section. Check here if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
temporary semi-protection Vandalism by multiple anon IP editors at least 10 times in the last 48 hours. Cosmomancer (talk) 06:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Multiple regular editors here complaining about IPs putting in false information and vandalizing page and asking for page protection; filing formal request after having to revert back 3 days to fix it all.-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, Seems to be a popular target for vandals. Most of the edits are vandalism and reversions. .Chamal Talk ± 05:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism.Chamal Talk ± 05:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Declined All of the vandalism is coming from one IP, and that IP is now blocked. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High amount of vandalism from anonymous IPs.DiverseMentality(Boo!) 05:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
semi-protect. Somehow attracts vandalism at least once a day, no idea who might be looking at this page ;) Confectionery could also be considered too. Kansaikiwi (talk) 04:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month. Tiptoety talk 04:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism, A lot of vandalism the past week by IPs and non-autoconfirmed users.– RyanCross (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of four days. Tiptoety talk 03:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, Vandalism from a series of IP-socks of blocked User:Vyaghradhataki. The page had been earlier semi-protected for a temporary period but after the period had expired the user had been continuing to vandalize the page. Please note that the page has been vandalized over 5 times during the last 24 hours. The history of vandalism goes back atleast until late 2007.See here. The page has been temporarily semi-protected twice. See here. But it hasn't worked. The vandalism still continues.RavichandarMy coffee shop 03:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months. Infinite isn't really an option. لennavecia 04:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection, this article has suffered tremendous vandalism averaging 2 reverts for the past month or so. ChyranandChloe (talk) 02:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Declined Although there is a significant amount of long-term vandalism, it is not overwhelming. As you noted, averaging a couple each day. Additionally, and more importantly, there are constructive edits from IPs and newly registered users, thus it would be a detriment to lose those such edits. لennavecia 04:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection, this article has suffered tremendous vandalism averaging four reverts a day. However, this article is also undergoing restructuring and may require some editorial help. ChyranandChloe (talk) 02:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. If there's significantly more disruptive activity in the future, consider relisting. And the vandalism seems to come from only one or two IPs, so a block or two would do it. GoodnightmushTalk 03:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks I'll start the crackdown. ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite semi-protection , The page will be a checkpage for the robot. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 02:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- So, why does it need to be protected? Tiptoety talk 04:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of forever. لennavecia 04:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , recreation of deleted material.░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Protected to prevent recreation Tiptoety talk 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Semi-Protect The same IP has vandalized the article for over a month. Thanks! E10ddie (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
temporary semi-protection Vandalism.LAAFansign review 00:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Move protected —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Declined – There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. If there's significantly more disruptive activity in the future, consider relisting. —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Protected to prevent recreation -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 00:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Already protected —αἰτίας •discussion• 00:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Strange. The Twinkle UI told me that, so I'm surprised that it added my request anyway.—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Protected to prevent recreation Tiptoety talk 01:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Anticipating a "decline": what exactly is the benefit of preserving the ability of someone to recreate this page?—Largo Plazo (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Protected to prevent recreation Tiptoety talk 00:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Protected to prevent recreation Tiptoety talk 00:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Protected to prevent recreation Tiptoety talk 00:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Protected to prevent recreation Tiptoety talk 00:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)